PARTISIPASI PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA MANAJERIAL BANK SYARIAH

Authors

  • Rosydalina Putri UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/jf.v4i1.593

Keywords:

Budgeting Participation, Motivation, Managerial Performance

Abstract

This study intends to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of budgeting participation and work motivation on managerial performance. The study was implemented in all Islamic Commercial Banks in Bandar Lampung in 2020. Data was collected by questionnaire sent to the leaders and employees that are directly related to expenditures and the determination of operational costs at Islamic Commercial Banks in Bandar Lampung. Of the 68 questionnaires distributed, there were 46 questionnaires that were returned or received with a 67,64% response rate. The data obtained were processed using The 3th version SmartPLS software with test results on the parameter coefficient between participation in budgeting and managerial performance. There was a positive effect with a t-statistic value of 3.981 and significant at 0.05. The second test result on the parameter coefficient between work motivation and managerial performance has a positive effect with a t-statistic value of 22.051 with a significant level of 0.05. The conclusion from this study states that budgetary participation and motivation to work together have an influence in determining managerial performance in Islamic banking in Bandar Lampung.

References

Sumber Jurnal:

Bryan, JF., and Locke, E.A., (1967), â€Performance Goals as Determinats of Level of Performance and Boredomâ€, Journal of Applied Psychology 51, pp. 120-130.

Brownell .P. (1982b), The Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation, Budgetary Parcipation, and Organizational Effectivenesss, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.20 (Sring): 12-27.

Brownell. P . and M. Mclnes, (1986), Budgetary Participation. Motivation, and Managerial Performance, The Accounting Review.Vol.LXI Oktober.

Eker, M. (2008). The affect of the relationship between budget participation and job relevant information on managerial performance. Age Academic Review, 8(1), 183-198.

Frucot, V., & Shearon, W.T. (1991). Budgetary Participation, Locus of Control and Mexican Manajerial Performance and Job Satisfaction. The Accounting Review, 66(1), 80-99. Gul et al,(1995), Desentralisation as a Moderating factor in the Budgetary Partisipation Performance Relationship: Some Hongkong Evidence. Accounting and Businnes Research. Vol 25,No. 98, pp 107-113.

Govindarajan, V., 1986. Impact of participation in the budgetary process on managerial attitude and performance: universalistic and contingency perspective. Decision Sciences Vol. 17, pp.495-516.

Kenis E. (1979). Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance. The Accounting Review, 707-721.

Kren, L. (1992). Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance: The Impact of Information and Environmental Volatility. The Accounting Review. July. Pp. 511-526.

Locke, E.A. 1968. Toward A Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. pp: 68-106.

Mahoney, T.A., T.H. Jerdee and S.J. Caroll, (1963), Development of managerial Performance: A Research Approach, Cincinnati: South Western Publ.Co. Malayu

Merchant,K.A.,(1981), “The Design of the Corporate Budgeting System: Influences on Managerial Behavior and Performanceâ€. The Accounting Review.pp 813-828.

Mia. L.(1998), Managerial Attitude, Motivation and Effectiveness of Budget Participation,Accounting Organazation and Society, Vol.13 No.5:465-475.

Milani,K., (1975), “The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting on Industrial Supervisor Performance and Attitudes: A Field Studyâ€. The Accounting Review. April. Pp.104-123.

Mitchell, T.R.,(1982),â€Motivation: New Direction for Theory, and Practiseâ€. Academy of Management Review.Vol.7.No.1.pp.80-88.

Riyadi, Slamet. (1988), Motivasi dan Pelimpahan Wewenang sebagai Variabel Moderating Dalam Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran dan Kinerja Manajerial. Seminar Nasional Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Surabaya.

Soetrisno, (2010). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Motivasi dan Pelimpahan Wewenang terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Tesis Magister Akuntansi Universitas Dipenogoro. Semarang.

Sukmantari Dewa Ayu Made Harlista Sukmantari, Wirasedana I Wayan Pradnyantha. 2015. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penganggaran Dan Komitmen Organisasi Pada Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 10.1 (2015): 261- ISSN: 2302 – 8556

Supomo, B. (1998), Pengaruh Struktur dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Efektifitas Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Manajerial Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Tesis S2 Magister Sains Akuntansi.

Sumber Buku:

A.Susty Ambarriani, Manajemen Biaya dengan Tekanan Stratejik, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2001.

Anthony, R., Vijay Govindarajan, 2005, Management Control System, Jilid I dan II, Terjemahan Kurniawan Tjakrawala dan Krista, Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Edy Sutrisno, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Pertama. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta : Penerbit Kencana.

Gibson L,dkk, (1985), Organisasi : Perilaku, Struktur, Proses, Edisi 5, Jilid 1, Erlangga, Jakarta

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & et al. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P., (1996), Organisasi&Motivasi, Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Ikhsan, Arfan, dkk. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Bandung: Citapustaka Media

Robbins., S.P., (2001), Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi 12. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wibowo,(2007), Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi Dua, Penerbit PT.Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles