TANTANGAN DAN KESEMPATAN WANITA DALAM LINGKUNGAN KERJA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/jm.v13i2.393Abstract
Kemunculan Gender Role Theory pada tahun 1980-an mengenai ekspektasi peran sosial bagaimana pria dan wanita sepatutnya berperilaku dan hal ini kemudian akan mempengaruhi persepsi orang di tempat kerja, masih bisa dirasakan hingga sekarang. Adanya Gender Role Theory memunculkan isu yang ramai diperbincangkan pada tahun 2000-an yaitu mengenai efek glass ceiling, yaitu suatu penghalang transparan yang menghalangi wanita untuk naik ke posisi yang lebih tinggi pada suatu tingkat dalam organisasi atau perusahaan. Efek glass ceiling ini masih bisa dirasakan terutama di posisis puncak manajemen, sehingga memunculkan adanya kuota implisit yang membatasi naiknya posisi jabatan wanita dalam top manajemen. Dalam critical review ini diuraikan bagaimana kemampuan wanita menjadi pemimpin yang mampu untuk membuat organisasi lebih kreatif dan inovatif serta dapat membawa kinerja keuangan menjadi lebih baik. Namun, terdapat ketidakadilan yang diterima wanita dalam pengakuan dan penghargaan dalam kinerja yang dilakukannya. Semakin banyaknya wanita yang mengenyam pendidikan tinggi dan mampu memperoleh posisi jabatan yang tinggi ternyata tidak membuat mereka memiliki kesempatan yang lebih untuk naik ke posisi jabatan yang lebih tinggi.
Â
Kata Kunci: Wanita, Manajemen Puncak, Kinerja Keuangan
References
Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. 2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98: 256–267.
Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. 2013. Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much . . .or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120: 110–122.
Baxter, Janeen, & Erik O. Wright. 2000. The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14 (2): 275–94.
Burke, R.J. (2006). Supporting women’s career advancement: international research findings.
Caceres-Rodriguez, Rick. 2011 The Glass Ceiling Revisited: Moving Beyond Discrimination in the Study of Gender in Public Organizations. Administration & Society, 45(6): 674–709.
Carli, L. L. 2010. Gender and group behavior. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology: 337–358. New York, NY: Springer.
Davies, M. (2015), Where Are We Now? 4th Annual Review, Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. 2012. A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 997–1015.
Dezso, L., C., et al. 2016. Is There an Implicit Quota on Women in Top Management? A Large Sample Statistical Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 98-115.
Eagly, A. H. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. 2007. Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 46: 63–71.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. 1991. Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 685–710.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573–598.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. 1995. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 125–145.
Financial News. 2016. FN women in finance survey 2016. Equal Opportunities International, 25 (1).
Fiorina, C. (2006), Tough Choices: A Memoir, Portfolio, New York, NY.
Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. 2005. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male–female teams. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 905–916.
Joshi, A., et al. 2015. When Can Women Close the Gap? A Meta-Analytic Test of Sex Differences in Performance and Rewards. Academic Management Journal. 58 (5): 1516-1545.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 616–642.
Kumra, S. and Vinnicombe, S. 2008. A study of the promotion to partner process in a professional services firm: how women are disadvantaged. British Journal of Management, 19: S65-S74, Article in special issue “Gender in management: new research directions†edited by Broadbridge, A. and Hearn, J., (2008), British Journal of Management, Vol. 19.
Lanaj, K., & Hollenbeck, R., J. 2015. Leadership Over-emergence in Self-managing Teams: The Role of Gender and Countervailing Biases. Academic Management Journal. 58 (5): 1476-1494.
Leach, B. (2009), “City bank’s ‘strip club’ culture excluded women, tribunal toldâ€, Daily Telegraph, 11 February.
Litzky, B. and Greenhaus, J. 2007. The relationship between gender and aspirations to senior management. Career Development International, 12 (7): 637-659.
Luckerath-Rovers, Mijntje. 2013. Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17: 491–509.
Mulcahy, M. and Linehan, C. 2014. Females and precarious board positions: further evidence of the glass cliff. British Journal of Management, 25 (3): 425-438.
Post, C., DiTomaso, N., Lowe, S. R., Ferris, G. R., & Cordero, R. 2009. A few good women: Gender differences in evaluations of promotability in industrial research and development. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24: 348–371.
Post, Corinne & Byron, Kris. 2015. Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Academic of Management Journal. 58 (5): 1546-1571.
Simpson, R. (2000), Gender mix and organisational fit: how gender imbalance at different levels of the organisation impacts on women managers. Women in Management Review, 15 (1): 5-18.
Smith, P., Caputi, P. and Crittenden, N. 2012. A maze of metaphors around glass ceilings. Gender in Management, 27 (7): 436-448.
The Economist (2011), “Special report, Women and workâ€, The Economist, November.
Vinnicombe, S., Burke, R.J., Blake-Beard, S. and Moore, L.L. 2015. Handbook of Research on Promoting Women’s Careers, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Weyer, B. 2007. Twenty years later: explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22 (6): 482-496.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Licensing and Reuse Rights
All articles published in Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, including commercial use, provided that the original author(s) and the source are properly credited.
Under the CC BY license, readers are allowed to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes
No additional permission is required from the authors or the publisher, as long as proper attribution is given.
The full license text can be accessed at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Â
Copyright and Author Rights Policy
Authors who publish in Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen retain the copyright of their articles.
By submitting and publishing their manuscript, authors grant Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen the right of first publication and the right to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the article in all forms and media.
All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
Under this license:
Authors retain full copyright ownership of their work.
The journal is granted the right to publish and disseminate the article as the original publisher.
Readers and third parties are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts, and reuse the articles for any lawful purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal.
No additional permission is required from the authors or the publisher for reuse that complies with the terms of the CC BY license.
The full license terms are available at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
