TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN (CG) DAN TINGKAT INOVASI PERUSAHAAN

Authors

  • Bayu Sindhu Raharja Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Surakarta
  • Nur Laila Yuliani Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/jm.v13i1.317

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between corporate governance in explaining the level of innovation of the company. The sample in this study uses companies that have a high level of liquidity in stock trading after the authoritarian era of the "New Order". This study uses a regression analysis tool to test the relationship between the two variables. As a result, this study found that corporate governance is an important factor that influences corporate innovation. The measuring instrument used to measure corporate governance in this study is the total number of commissioners in the company. The results of this study state that the total number of commissioners or corporate governance has a positive effect on the level of innovation of the company. This finding is very important for practitioners, especially for company managers who want to develop their company's innovations. While in the theoretical aspects, these findings strengthen the theory relating to corporate governance.

 

Keywords: Keganenan theory, Principal-Agent Theory, Commissioner, Investment

References

Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3213–3226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020

Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003

Belloc, F. (2011). Corporate governance and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5), 835–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00681.x

Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Yonker, S. (2017). Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.009

Ghouma, H., Ben-nasr, H., & Yan, R. (2017). Corporate Governance and Cost of Debt Financing: Empirical Evidence From Canada. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.06.004

Gu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on corporate innovation. Journal of Economics and Business, 90, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2016.12.002

Ho, C. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness : an international analysis. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 1–43.

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. a, Johnson, R. a, & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogenety and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies. Academy of Management, 45(4), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069305

Hsu, P. H., Lee, H. H., Liu, A. Z., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Corporate innovation, default risk, and bond pricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.09.005

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

Jiang, X., & Yuan, Q. (2018). Institutional investors’ corporate site visits and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.019

Kayalvizhi, P. N., & Thenmozhi, M. (2017). Does Quality of Innovation, Culture and Governance Drive FDI? : Evidence from Emerging Markets. Emerging Markets Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2017.11.007

Lehrer, M., Tylecote, A., & Conesa, E. (1999). Corporate Governance, Innovation Systems and Industrial Performance. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662719900000003

Mande, V., Park, Y. K., & Son, M. (2012). Equity or Debt Financing : Does Good Corporate Governance Matter ? Corporate Governance, 20(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00897.x

Mathew, S., Ibrahim, S., & Archbold, S. (2017). Corporate governance and firm risk. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, CG-02-2017-0024. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2017-0024

Miozzo, M., & Dewick, P. (2002). Building competitive advantage: Innovation and corporate governance in European construction. Research Policy, 31(6), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00173-1

Neifar, S., & Jarboui, A. (2017). Corporate governance and operational risk voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Islamic banks. Research in International Business and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.09.006

Parrilli, M. D., & Elola, A. (2012). The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A Survey of Corporate Governance. NBER Working Paper 5554, 1–80.

Switzer, L. N., Tu, Q., & Wang, J. (2017). Corporate governance and default risk in financial firms over the post-financial crisis period : International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.09.023

Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-mejia, L. R. (1998). A Behavioral Agency Model Of Managerial Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.

Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (December 2016), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.035

Downloads

Published

2019-04-16

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019): April

Section

Articles

License

Licensing and Reuse Rights

All articles published in Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.

This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, including commercial use, provided that the original author(s) and the source are properly credited.

Under the CC BY license, readers are allowed to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes

No additional permission is required from the authors or the publisher, as long as proper attribution is given.

The full license text can be accessed at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Copyright and Author Rights Policy

Authors who publish in Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen retain the copyright of their articles.

By submitting and publishing their manuscript, authors grant Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen the right of first publication and the right to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the article in all forms and media.

All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.

Under this license:

  • Authors retain full copyright ownership of their work.

  • The journal is granted the right to publish and disseminate the article as the original publisher.

  • Readers and third parties are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts, and reuse the articles for any lawful purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal.

No additional permission is required from the authors or the publisher for reuse that complies with the terms of the CC BY license.

The full license terms are available at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/