FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PERILAKU ETIS PROFESI AKUNTAN PENDIDIK (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI DI PROVINSI LAMPUNG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24127/akuisisi.v10i2.29Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the various factors that influence ethical behavior accounting profession educators in Lampung Province. Analysis of the data of this study are included in the quantitative research and aimed to test the hypothesis. Structural analysis of studies using Equetion Modeling (SEM) in order to obtain a comprehensive model of research results, both direct effect and indirect effect. The results showed that moral reasoning does not significantly affect the ethical behavior accountant educator. The findings of this study are not consistent with existing theory and do not support some
of the results of previous studies which claim that moral reasoning would easily make a moral judgment and moral behavior. The influence of moral reasoning on the ethical behavior of the accounting profession educators tend to be straightforward. The findings of this study are consistent with existing theory and supports some of the results of previous studies which state that will facilitate one's professional experience make moral judgment and moral behavior. Ethical attitude will automatically bring ethical behavior as well. The influence of professional experience to the ethical behavior of the accounting profession educators tend to be direct or through locus of control.
Â
Keywords:
Moral thinking, professional experience, locus of control and ethical behavior.
References
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P.1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational, British 63, 1-18
Arens, A. A and Loebbecke, James. K. 1997. “Auditing an Integrated Approachâ€. 8th Ed. Engelwood Cliff. Prentice Hall
Beekun, Rafik I, 1997, Islamic Business Ethics, International Institute of Islamic Thought, Virginia, USA
Chan, Samuel Y.S. and Leung, Philomena. 2006. “The effect of accounting student’s ethical reasoning and personel factors on their ethical sensitivityâ€, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 436-457.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C.A., & Chen, P.Y. 2000. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Mangement 27, 324-351
Falah. S. 2007. “Pengaruh Budaya Etis Organisasi dan Orientasi Etika Terhadap Sensitivitas Etikaâ€. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X Makasar, 26-28 Juli
Ferdinand, A. 2006. Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen. Edisi 5. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Fraedrich, J.P., & Ferrell, O.C. 1992a. Cognitive consistency of marketing managers in ethical situations, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 245-252.
Griffin, Rizky W., dan R. J Ebert. 1998. Business. Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood. Clift
Haris, J.R., and C. D. Sutton. 1995. “ Unravelling the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Clues from an empirical study comparing fortune 1000 executives and MBA studentsâ€, Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 805-817.
Imam, Gozali. 2008. Model Persamaan Struktural : Konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS Ver. 5.0. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Keraf, Sonny 1998. Etika Bisnis Tuntutan dan Relevansinya, Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Khomsiyah dan N. Indriantoro. 1998. “Pengaruh Orientasi Etika terhadap Komitmen dan Sensitivitas Etika Auditor Pemerintah di DKI Jakartaâ€. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia. vol.1 Januari hal. 13 – 28
Kohlberg, L. 1983. The cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. Dlm. Rogrs, D. Issues in adolescent psychology: 283-299. New Jersey: Printice Hall, Inc.
Larkin, Joseph M. 2000. “The Ability of Internal Auditors to Identify Ethical Dilemmasâ€. Journal of Business Ethics 23: 401-409
Maryani dan Ludigdo. 2001. “Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Sikap dan Perilaku Etis Akuntanâ€. TEMA, Volume II, Nomor 1, Maret
Morgan, Ronald B. 1993. “Self and Co-Worker Perceptions of Ethics and Their Relationship to Leadership and Salaryâ€. Academy of Management Journal 36: 200-214
Nugrahaningsih. 2005. “Analisis Perbedaan Perilaku Etis Auditor di KAP dalam Etika Profesi (Studi Terhadap Peran Faktor-faktor Individual: Locus of Control, Lama Pengalaman Kerja, Gender, dan Equity Sensitivity)â€. SNA VIII Solo, 15-16 September
Reiss, Michelle C., and Kaushik Mitra. 1998. “The effect of Individual Difference Factors on the Acceptibility of Ethical and Unethical Workplace Behaviors†Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 17: 1581-1593.
Robbins, S.P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Jilid 1 edisi Indonesia. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.
Rotter, J.B. 1966. “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcementâ€, Psychological Monograph, General and Applied, Vol. 80 No. 1, (Whole No. 609).
Smith, H., & Tyler, T. 1997. Choosing the right pond: the impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33, 146-170
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: